Guidelines for Product ID, Labels and Shipments (GPID)
Supply Chain Foundation Guide (SCF)
Label Implementation Guide (LIG)
The Pet Industry Label Implementation Guide (LIG)
7. Bar Code Print Quality (rev October 2008)
7.1 Overview to Printing and Applying Bar Codes
One reason that bar code technology has grown so rapidly is that bar codes can be printed with many different methods. Bar codes can be printed with impact printers, thermal printers, toner-based printers (lasers), ink jet printers, and virtually any photographic or wet ink process on almost any surface.
7.2 Deciding Which Printing Technology to Use
One of the first decisions a project team must make is how they are going to print each different type of bar code they need to create. For economic, logistical or technical reasons, different printing methods might be used to print each of the three different types of labels described in the GS1 standards:
In general terms, each symbol / label can be:
Labels can be produced using a variety of printing techniques including:
Furthermore, labels can be produced in-house or purchased through a service bureau.
This chapter discusses each of these techniques and the very important topic of Bar Code Print Quality.
7.3 Bar Code Quality
Before getting into the different methods of printing bar codes, it's important to discuss bar code print quality. Just because a bar code looks good to our eye, doesn't mean that it is actually printed properly and should be readable by various scanning devices throughout the supply chain. This is such an important issue that some retailers have resorted to fines or "charge backs" for out-of-specification bar codes.
Bar code print quality is always the responsibility of the supplier. Regardless of whether the supplier prints bar code symbols or a service bureau provides bar codes to the supplier. In any event, the supplier needs to be sure that the bar codes are readable throughout all aspects of the shipping process to the final user.
The cost of creating bad bar codes can be extremely high. Ask the candy company that printed hundreds of thousands of red bar codes on candy wrappers for a Christmas promotion and had to call them all back because red bars are invisible to most bar code scanners. Or ask the company that was charged $30,000 by its customer for marking its products with unreadable bar codes.
Bar code "quality" involves the actual print quality and several other important issues that combine to determine if a bar code is in or out of specification.
Some retailers have selected a specific brand of verification equipment for their testing and don’t accept results from any other brand of verifier. This situation is not common and is usually a legacy from before the ANSI X3.182 Quality Standard, but it’s a good idea to check with the customer to see if they have a preferred brand of testing equipment.
ANSI Print Quality
The American National Standards Institute has published a bar code print quality specification. Named ANSI X3.182, this specification uses 8 categories of measurement criteria to grade bar code print quality using letter grades ranging from A to F. Any grade other than an "F" is considered passing. As a rule of thumb, the higher the letter score, the easier it will be to read. Some bar code specifications reference this specification and specify that labels must receive a specific letter grade or better, i.e. "C" or better. Some bar code verifiers can test to the ANSI print quality test. As standards are updated, inclusion of ANSI print quality references will grow. Verifier manufacturers are offering more options that incorporate the ANSI print quality measurement.
The ANSI print quality grading method is based on the relationship between the printed symbol and the way bar code scanners interpret the symbol. Scanning performance is key to the process. In order to determine how well a bar code will perform in typical situations, a number of measurements are performed by a verifier to determine the final grade of the symbol.
Similarly, a European standard was developed a number of years ago. Fortunately, a worldwide common specification has evolved and accepted as the common ANSI/ISO/CEN standard.
The first key measurement is decode. This is a test to decipher the bars and spaces into meaningful data. Assuming that the decode test passes, the other checks are graded from A through F. If the symbol cannot be decoded, it fails and automatically receives a grade of F. Other measurements include:
This is a measurement that tests the printing accuracy of the symbol. In general, the higher level of decodability, the better a scanner can be expected to perform.
A measurement between the largest and smallest reflectances in a scan profile. In general, the lighter the spaces and darker the bars, the better the symbol contrast. Colored symbols are acceptable if they provide adequate contrast.
The ratio of the minimum edge contrast to the symbol contrast. This test looks at the edges of the bars and compares them to the "clarity" of the spaces and also looks at the edges to be sure that they are not wavy or fuzzy. It also grades the extent to which narrower bars and spaces are “visible” to the scanner and verifier.
The irregularities found within elements and quiet zones. Most often these are spots (dark blots in the middle of a light space) or voids (light blots in the middle of a dark bar) in the symbol.
This a measure of the amount of light reflected from an illuminated source. Light is reflected from the spaces and absorbed by the bars and this measurement checks the spaces and quiet zones to be sure that ample light is being reflected so that a scanner can pick up the bar and space elements in a bar code.
Other factors also contribute to the determination of how a symbol is graded such as label material opacity, surface gloss measurement, and the effect of over-laminates.
For most compliance applications, hand held laser scanners will be used. This is an application where ANSI Grade "C" or better is acceptable and the mandate will typically specify this measurement. Note that ANSI grade “C” or better is specified for all UPC-A symbol use. Interleaved 2 of 5 (ITF-14) may have a grade as low as “D” for the Reflectance grading parameter only, and only when printed directly on corrugate with a wet ink process in an Off-Line process or an Ink Jet technology in an On-Line process. Ink Jet may be considered when cartons (with NO pre-printing) are used.
Placement of the Label
Verification tests the symbol for its characteristics but to comply with the specification, quality procedures that check for the correct human readable interpretation and label placement as well as test for label adhesion are needed.
All quality checks need to be documented and kept on file in case future quality questions arise.
In summary, procedures to monitor the quality of the bar code printing and placement must be written and approved by IT and Operations.